When an Agent Leaves and the Business Follows: Failure or Inevitable?
- Milton Jannusch
- 3 days ago
- 4 min read
In Australian and UK agency models, this is one of the most commercially sensitive fault lines in the entire business. When a BDM, PM, or sales agent exits and a portion of the portfolio migrates with them, the default reaction is blame.
But strategically, the better question is:
Was the revenue attached to the brand — or attached to the individual?
That distinction determines whether it’s a systems issue, a leadership issue, or simply market reality.
1. Is It the Agency’s Fault?
Sometimes, yes.
If the portfolio walks because:
Clients only ever dealt with the individual
There was no brand equity in the relationship
The CRM data was incomplete or controlled by the employee
There was no secondary contact point
The agency never embedded itself operationally
Then that’s a structural weakness, not bad luck.
This is especially relevant in rent roll businesses where value is calculated on a multiple (e.g. 2.5x–3.5x management income in many Australian transactions). If retention risk is high, the multiple compresses. Buyers discount instability.
For someone like you operating in rent roll brokerage and health checks, this is exactly the risk profile buyers probe first.
2. Is It the Owner’s Fault?
Possibly — but more subtly.
Owner failure usually shows up in:
Weak employment contracts
No enforceable restraint or non-solicitation clauses
No structured client handover processes
Cultural over-reliance on “star performers”
Poor succession planning
Many principals build revenue around rainmakers because growth feels urgent. But that creates concentration risk.
If 30–40% of fee income is attributable to one person, you don’t have a diversified asset — you have dependency exposure.
From a commercial due diligence standpoint, buyers call this “key person risk.”
3. Or Is It Just the Game?
There is a hard truth here:
Real estate is relational.
Clients often follow trust, not logos.
In sales agencies especially, movement is more common because:
Sales agents market themselves as personal brands
Vendor relationships are short-cycle
Commission income is personality-driven
In rent roll, however, it should be less volatile — because:
The relationship is longer-term
Operational systems matter more than charisma
Process consistency is valued
If rent roll clients leave purely because one PM exits, that’s a red flag about structural integration.
4. The Real Question: Was the Client Embedded Into the Agency?
High-retention agencies do three things exceptionally well:
1️⃣ They Make the Brand Bigger Than the Individual
All communication comes from branded domains
Landlords have multiple contact points
Reviews and testimonials are brand-focused
The principal is visible but not dominant
The message: You are choosing our system, not just our person.
2️⃣ They Use Contracts Properly (Not Aggressively — Strategically)
Strong but reasonable:
Non-solicitation clauses
Post-employment restraints (geographic + time-bound)
Confidentiality clauses around CRM data
Gardening leave clauses where appropriate
In Australia, enforceability depends on reasonableness. Overreach kills enforceability.
In the UK, restraint drafting must protect legitimate business interests — not just punish departure.
Agencies that treat contracts casually often pay for it later.
3️⃣ They Operationalise Client Relationships
This is where mature operators stand apart.
Regular principal check-ins with top-tier landlords
Team-based portfolio management
Shared inboxes, not personal ones
Centralised documentation ownership
Automated reporting systems
If your systems are institutionalised, staff departure becomes inconvenient — not catastrophic.
5. Practical Retention Safeguards Agency Owners Should Implement
A. Diversify Contact Points
Every landlord should know:
Their PM
The department manager
The accounts contact
The principal (at least by name and occasional visibility)
No single-thread dependency.
B. Strengthen Data Control
No personal CRM exports
Access logs monitored
Offboarding checklist includes immediate system lockdown
Audit recent data downloads before resignation date
If you ever end up in litigation, data trail matters.
C. Protect the Rent Roll Asset Structurally
Ensure signed management authorities are stored centrally
Keep fee schedules standardised
Avoid bespoke side agreements negotiated privately
Fragmented documentation weakens enforcement.
D. Introduce Retention Incentives
Deferred bonuses
Profit share linked to portfolio retention
Equity pathways (carefully structured)
Golden handcuffs are often cheaper than portfolio erosion.
Given your own UK operations (Pro Property London), you already understand operational systems are the moat — not just relationships. Same principle applies here.
E. Conduct Regular Portfolio Risk Reviews
This is where your “rent roll health check” concept becomes commercially powerful.
Ask:
What % of revenue is linked to each staff member?
What would 20% attrition look like?
What’s the weighted average tenure of landlords?
Are top landlords relationship-heavy or brand-heavy?
If owners measured concentration risk like investors, they would build differently.
6. When Business Leaves — What Should the Owner Actually Do?
Emotion is expensive.
Instead:
Activate restraint provisions immediately (if enforceable)
Contact top 20% landlords personally
Reinforce stability messaging
Offer service enhancements (not fee discounts)
Document everything
Speed of response determines loss curve.
Final Position
Is it the agency’s fault?
Sometimes.
Is it the owner’s fault?
Often partially.
Is it inevitable?
Only if systems are weaker than personalities.
The agencies that retain business through staff exits have:
Brand gravity
Operational depth
Legal structure
Leadership visibility
Data discipline
The ones that don’t? They built a personality business inside a corporate wrapper.
And buyers — especially in 2026’s acquisition climate — will price that risk immediately.
Comments